Task #5
open[SEC-04] Sharique + a CA/GST advisor must explicitly decide and document which model Attirelly actually runs, in writing. This determines who recognizes revenue, who owes GST/TCS, and how vendor payouts work — and blocks further invoice/settlement work...
0%
Description
Module: Payment / Legal
Current State:
Two contradicting seller-of-record models exist in the code at the same time: payment_service.py's checkout comment says Attirelly is the sole seller-of-record issuing ONE consolidated invoice under its own GSTIN (matches how Myntra operates) and explicitly says "do NOT generate per-vendor invoices" — but the invoice code actually shipped this session generates a SEPARATE tax invoice per vendor naming the VENDOR as "Sold By" (matches how Flipkart operates). These cannot both be true at once.
Task:
Sharique + a CA/GST advisor must explicitly decide and document which model Attirelly actually runs, in writing. This determines who recognizes revenue, who owes GST/TCS, and how vendor payouts work — and blocks further invoice/settlement work until it's resolved.
Why It Matters:
This is a legal/accounting foundation question, not an engineering guess — and it's currently unanswered in the code itself.
Target Week: Week 1
Excel Owner: Sharique
Excel Priority: P0 - Critical
Excel Status: Not Started
Sprint Plan ID: SEC-04
No data to display